To help you evaluate all of our next theory, we very first recoded, per of the things that on the reputation level, the brand new portion of solutions you to definitely let you know if husbands have less, equal or more ratings, specifically, updates, with hypogamy, and thus husbands has straight down standing than simply wives, homogamy, definition equivalent status, and you may hypergamy, meaning husbands which have high updates than simply wives. Toward prospective relationship from country, analyses was in fact extreme from inside the education (X 2 =eleven.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you will financial feeling out of a prospective divorce case (X dos =nine.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Analysis indicated that, getting Spanish professionals, there clearly was far https://datingranking.net/it/siti-di-incontri-per-adulti/ more education hypogamy, whereas to possess Dominican members there’s significantly more studies homogamy. Towards financial affairs in the eventuality of divorce case, because there is much more homogamy for Foreign-language participants, discover so much more hypergamy to possess Dominicans (see Figure step one).
Which have prior marriages or perhaps not was not related in order to variations in status. Regarding potential organization between condition and you will many years hitched, high connectivity have been used in health (X dos =14.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and while getting couples y is out there (40.4%, each), to have couples y is available (43.4%). This means that, into the group with years hitched, husbands has actually straight down health condition. With youngsters away from prior marriages and having youngsters of most recent relationships don’t significantly apply at standing.
Inside the contribution, new analyses regarding second theory showed that as opposed to our very own standards, the greatest element related to help you reputation ‘s the country.
Univariate screening found high variations in grounds step one (F=5
To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).
Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.
In the end, hypogamy things during the Spain scored significantly lower than hypogamy factors for the Dominican Republic
Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.
Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).